Short Settlement Due to ‘Non-Payable Items’

Somewhere in Mumbai, Ananya sat at her dining table with a hospital bill in front of her and the post-surgery ache in her side. The surgery had gone well. The insurer had “approved” her claim. The hospital had discharged her smoothly.

Everything should have been fine.

Except it wasn’t.

Her approved claim of ₹1,38,000 had magically shrunk to ₹1,09,400.

A neat little line item stared back at her:

 “Non-payable consumables – ₹28,600.”

No explanation.

No breakdown.

Just a quiet assumption that she would accept this, as most people do.

But Ananya did something unusual that day: she paused. She wondered, “Should something essential to my treatment be considered ‘non-payable’?”

Most policyholders never even ask that question. Yet that question is where every unfair short settlement begins to crumble.


1. The Truth Behind ‘Non-Payable’ That Nobody Tells You

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) provided a list of around 200+ items that the health insurer would exclude as part of the health insurance policy. 

So you get deductions like:

     ₹1,850 — “gloves”

 

     ₹950 — “cotton rolls”

 

     ₹2,200 — “syringes”

 

     ₹3,000 — “room consumables”

 

Sounds tiny, right? Until you realise these “tiny deductions” become ₹12,000–₹35,000 losses per claim.

Usually, these out-of-pocket costs make up about 5–10% of the medical bill. (mint, 2022.)

When talking numbers, for a bill around ₹5 lakh, this might be between ₹25,000 and ₹50,000. 

Many short settlements occur not because the insurer is acting maliciously. On the contrary, it was intended to benefit both sides; policyholders aren't left wondering what won't be covered while also being protected from unjustified exclusions, and insurers have a consistent point of reference.

Moreover, following the COVID-19 pandemic, a lot of health plans now include "consumables/non medical expense cover" that covers the price of certain items (PPE kits, gloves, syringes etc.)

2. The Myth That Makes Everyone Give Up

Hospitals follow a billing structure. Insurers follow a claims policy. And both rely on a third layer — the internal non-payable list created as per IRDAI guidelines and product-specific terms. But here’s the expertly verified truth:

Short settlements are NOT final.  They are highly contestable.

You can—and absolutely should—contest:

     Items essential to surgery or treatment

 

     Incorrectly coded items

 

     Consumables medically required

 

     Items misinterpreted by TPA software

 

     Any deduction without a clause-based explanation

Many deductions are legitimate. But many are simply the result of:

  poor coding

  misunderstandings of policy wording

  hospitals adding misc. consumables

  insurers applying standard lists instead of plan-specific terms

If your Claimsettlement is unexpectedly low, and you see unexplained consumable deductions, you have every right to question, analyse, and contest them.

3. Ananya’s Saving Grace: A Subject Matter Expert

Ananya eventually reached out to a Subject Matter Expert specialising in Insuranceclaim-related issues and claimrejection-related issues. They combed through her documents. 

Her procedure — a laparoscopic surgery — was a package treatment at that hospital. By definition, the package already includes consumables such as drapes, syringes, surgical gloves, IV sets, and dressing material.Every item deducted under “non-payable” belonged inside the package. Every rupee deducted was incorrect.

 Right?

However, this 'package' definition is for hospital billing purposes only. The hospital ‘bundles’ items for administrative simplicity, offering a single price for the entire procedure. This ensures all the hospital's costs are covered in one transaction.

A standard health insurance plan (without a specialized consumables add-on cover.) in India often categorises these same items as non-payable consumables. 

After demanding an itemized bill from the hospital and comparing it rigorously against her policy's list of non-payable items, she found a few critical discrepancies.a duplicate entry for an IV, a few mislabeled items which were re-evaluated and covered. 

In the end she could recover around ₹12,000. The rest she had to pay out-of-pocket.

4. Where Policyholders Actually Have Power

Ananya's experience highlights a vital truth about health insurance short settlements: insurers rely heavily on standardized exclusion lists, and hospital billing errors are common. 

By challenging the deduction with evidence, you can ensure you're only paying for legitimate, non-covered expenses, not the hospital's mistakes.

The core lesson for navigating a short-settled claim remains clear:

     Know your policy: Understand your coverage and exclusions before hospitalization.

     Get an itemized bill: Always request and review a detailed itemized hospital bill to check for discrepancies.

     Don't be afraid to contest discrepancies: If you find errors or questionable "non-payable items," formally contest the health insurance claim for re-evaluation."

Most policyholders never contest these points because they don’t know they exist.  Experts do — and this difference is often what recovers money people never knew they lost.

Hospitals handle volume.

Insurers handle compliance. TPAs handle timelines.

No one has the bandwidth to manually cross-check every consumable against every policy wording for every patient.

You know who does have that bandwidth? 

Subject Matter Experts who work exclusively on claim settlement, short settlements, claim rejections and Insurance claim-related issues.

They decode the system, identify what’s fair, and ensure the policyholder gets exactly what they are contractually entitled to — not a rupee less.

 

Conclusion

Before You Accept a Short Settlement… Pause.

If you see unexplained deductions or a sudden chunk missing under “non-payable items,” remember this:

A short settlement is not a final claim settlement. It’s just the settlement you got before anyone contested it.

A Subject Matter Expert can catch what the system misses, question what isn’t justified, and recover what you didn’t know you could claim.

The difference is not aggression.

 The difference is expertise.

 


Post a Comment

0 Comments