You have called the hospital. They tell you the documents have been submitted to the TPA.
You call the TPA. They say the
insurer has not approved the claim.
You contact the insurer. They ask
you to coordinate with the hospital.
And just like that, you find
yourself making the same three calls again, except now you are more exhausted
and no closer to an answer.
If this sounds familiar, you are
not alone in finding the process confusing. When a health insurance claim gets
delayed or questioned, it is not always obvious which organisation needs to
take the next step. The hospital, Third Party Administrator (TPA) and insurer
may all be involved, but they do not perform the same functions.
So, what to do now?
1. First, Who Does What?
Let us first understand the three
parties involved.
● The
hospital provides treatment and maintains the medical records, bills, discharge
summaries and other clinical documents needed for the claim.
● The
TPA (Third Party Administrator) is an organisation engaged by an insurer to
provide specified health insurance administration services. Depending on the
arrangement, this can include processing claim
settlement documents, coordinating with hospitals and communicating claim
requirements.
● The
insurer provides the insurance cover and is responsible for the insurance
decision, including CIS for a claim
settlement or communicating the reasons for a claim's rejection.
The distinction matters because a
TPA may coordinate the assessment, but it does not replace the insurer's
responsibility for the claim decision. Similarly, an insurer cannot correct a
hospital's billing error without the necessary information from the hospital.
Now, let's look at what these differences mean when
something goes wrong.
2. Four Situations That May Feel Painfully Familiar
Case 1: "The hospital says it has sent everything."
● What
happened
An elderly parent is admitted to
a network hospital for a planned procedure. The family submits the insurance
card and other requested information at the admission desk. Later, the hospital
says the cashless request has been sent, but authorisation is still pending.
The family calls the TPA, which
requests an additional investigation report. The hospital says it has already
uploaded the records.
Everyone may be acting in good
faith, yet the claim remains unresolved.
● What
could be happening?
The report may not have reached
the correct claim file, may be illegible, or may not contain the information
requested. Alternatively, the insurer may need a clinical clarification before
making a decision.
● Who
should you contact?
Ask the TPA or the insurer
handling the authorisation to identify the precise document or clarification
outstanding. Then ask the hospital's insurance desk to verify whether it has
been submitted successfully.
Request a reference number or
written confirmation wherever possible. "Everything has been sent" is
reassuring, but knowing which document
was sent, when, and to whom is much more useful.
Remember that a pending cashless authorisation is not
automatically a claim rejection. If
treatment is urgent, do not delay necessary medical care while waiting for an
administrative decision; discuss the available arrangements with the hospital.
Case 2: "The insurer says the bill does not match the records."
● What happened
A patient undergoes surgery and
submits a reimbursement claim after discharge. Weeks later, the insurer raises
a query because a procedure listed on the bill is not sufficiently explained in
the submitted medical records.
The family is understandably frustrated. The surgery
happened. The bill was paid.
Why is there another question?
● What
could be happening?
The billing description may be
unclear, a supporting procedure note may be missing, or the insurer may require
additional information to assess the expense under the policy. A documentation
query does not, by itself, establish that the treatment was improper or the
claim invalid.
● Who
should you contact?
Start with the insurer or the
claims administrator named in the query to understand exactly what
clarification is required. If the missing information relates to the procedure,
billing or treatment records, approach the hospital's medical records department
or billing team for the relevant document or correction.
Do not ask the hospital to change a record merely to
satisfy the insurer. Any correction must accurately reflect what happened.
Case 3: "The hospital says cashless was not approved, so I have to pay everything."
● What
happened
A family arrives at a network
hospital expecting cashless treatment. The hospital informs them that
authorisation has not been granted. They are asked to make payment
arrangements, and nobody is able to explain clearly about why the rejection
happened or if it can be reconsidered.
● What
could be happening?
Cashless authorisation may be
awaiting information, may have been declined, or may be affected by policy
conditions or the information supplied.
● Who
should you contact?
Ask the hospital's insurance desk
for the status and reference number of the authorisation request. Contact the
TPA or insurer to obtain the specific reason for the pending decision or
decline, along with any available next steps.
If cashless treatment is
unavailable, ask the hospital and insurer whether you can proceed with payment
and submit a reimbursement claim, subject to the policy terms and the
applicable process. Keep the bills, receipts, medical records and all
correspondence.
A cashless request being declined
does not necessarily mean that a subsequent reimbursement claim will also be
rejected.
Case 4: "I have complained, but nobody has replied."
● What happened
A reimbursement claim has been
pending for weeks. The policyholder has emailed customer service, spoken to the
TPA and followed up with the hospital, but still has no clear explanation.
At this stage, making another
routine inquiry may not be enough.
● What
could be happening?
The matter may require formal
escalation, particularly if the insurer has not adequately addressed a
complaint about the delay or the handling of the claim.
● Who
should you contact?
Submit a written grievance to the
insurer's Grievance Redressal Officer (GRO). Include the policy number, claim
reference, relevant dates, copies of earlier correspondence and a concise
explanation of the unresolved issue. Keep the acknowledgement and grievance
reference.
IRDAI states that insurers are
required to resolve grievances within 15 days of receipt. If you remain
dissatisfied or do not receive a response, you can explore the further
escalation options described by IRDAI, including the Bima Bharosa system and,
where the applicable eligibility requirements are met, the Insurance Ombudsman.
A formal grievance should identify the problem and the
resolution sought. It is more effective than sending several disconnected
messages that do not explain what remains unresolved.
A simple rule: follow the issue,
not just the organisation
3. When You Are Unsure Whom To Contact, Use This Quick Guide.
|
If the problem is… |
Your first practical step |
|
Missing
medical records or a billing error |
Contact the hospital's
relevant department. |
|
A
pending authorisation or unclear document request |
Ask the TPA or insurer
managing the claim to specify what is outstanding. |
|
A
deduction or claim rejection you
do not understand |
Request the insurer's
written explanation and the applicable policy clause. |
|
A
prolonged delay in claim process with
no clear update |
Follow up in writing with
the insurer and retain the reference number. |
|
An
unresolved service complaint |
Escalate through the
insurer's formal grievance mechanism. |
This is a starting point, not a rigid rule. A single
problem may require coordination between two or more parties. The aim is to
establish who needs to act next, rather than assuming that the first
organisation you contacted is responsible for every part of the claim.
4. Where
Does Bima Seva Kendra Fit In?
Sometimes the difficulty is not
making contact. It is understanding what the responses actually mean.
A policyholder may have a
hospital bill, a TPA message, an insurer's email and a policy document, yet
still be unable to identify the missing link. In such circumstances, an
experienced subject matter expert can help review the available records,
explain the relevant policy terms, organise the sequence of correspondence and
identify a reasonable next step.
SMEs main motive is helping
policyholders understand their situation before deciding how to proceed.
Depending on the case, that may involve identifying a missing document,
understanding the reason for a deduction, preparing a clearer follow-up or
explaining the insurer's grievance process.
That kind of guidance should be accessible to people regardless of their education, occupation or financial circumstances. No one should need to understand insurance jargon before being able to ask a reasonable question about their own claim.
Conclusion
If you are dealing with recurring
insurance claim-related issues, a delay in claim process, or claim rejection-related issues, clarity
about the next step is a practical place to begin.
Keep your communications in
writing wherever possible, and save reference numbers, emails and submitted
documents.
You do not have to know every
insurance rule to ask for a clear answer. You simply need to know what remains
unresolved, what evidence supports your concern and who is responsible for
addressing it.
And if those three things are still difficult to work out, getting help from an SME to make sense of the paperwork may be the most useful next call you make.

0 Comments